LAWS THAT REGULATE FIREARMS
The vast majority of the laws we will discuss are going to be those laws that regulate the buying and/or building of Silencers, Short-Barreled Rifles, Short-Barreled Shotguns, Destructive Devices, Machine Guns, and “Any Other Weapons,” which are often referred to as “NFA Firearms.” So, before we get the cart in front of the horse, let’s talk more generally about laws
State vs Federal Firearms Laws
There are two sets of laws that regulate NFA firearms: Federal law and State law.
STATE STATUTES
We won’t spend too much time on State Law, as every state has different rules and regulations. If you want to read your State’s laws, you can find them in the state statutes. But unfortunately, your state’s firearms laws are usually difficult to find, as they are typically spread out all over the place. As each law is passed, it gets added to the statutes, which are grouped by the date the law was passed, not by the subject matter. That’s why we recommend starting your search by visiting the the NRA website. The NRA has grouped all of the relevant state laws into one place, which makes them much easier to find. At a minimum, the NRA website will give you a solid start on tracking down the individual statutes you are looking for.
FEDERAL STATUTES
Our main focus is going to be on the Federal laws that apply to NFA firearms, which can be found in two main places:
The first place to look is in the Federal Statutes (Statutes is a big word that is used for laws that have been passed by Congress). Even though Congress is continually passing gun laws, most gun laws have been grouped together into big packages called Acts. There are three main Acts for gun laws, The National Firearms Act (NFA), Gun Control Act (GCA), and the Firearm Owners Protection Act.
History of the Federal Firearms Statutes
In 1934, the National Firearms Act (NFA) was passed as an effort to deter gangsters (like Al Capone) from killing everyone and committing other violent crimes. The Feds reasoned that crime would go away if they taxed the guns used by the gangsters. The Act primarily imposed a $200 tax on machine guns, silencers, and sawed-off shotguns. It also required people to register machine guns, silencers, and sawed-off shotguns. And, it made possession of unregistered firearms a felony.
The Gun Control Act (GCA) was passed in 1968 in response to the assassination of President Kennedy. The Act was designed to impose much stricter licensing and regulation of the firearms industry. The Act created new categories of firearms offenses and prohibited the sale of firearms or ammunition to felons and certain other people that are known as “prohibited persons.”
In 1982, a Senate subcommittee conducted a study on the 2nd Amendment and on the people that were being prosecuted for firearms related crimes. The resulting report stated the more than 75% of the prosecutions coming from ATF arrests were “aimed at ordinary citizens who had neither criminal intent nor knowledge, but were enticed by agents into unknowing technical violations.”
In 1986, Congress responded to these unintended and undesirable results by passing the Firearm Owners Protection Act (FOPA). The FOPA made it easier to purchase guns and ammunition and reduced the record keeping requirements of gun store owners. Additionally, because the ATF had been abusing their power (by repeatedly inspecting gun stores solely to harass them), the Firearm Owner’s Protection Act limited the ATF’s right to inspect gun stores’ record books to only one time per year. Unfortunately, in addition to the relaxed regulations found in the FOPA, the Act had some downfalls, including a ban on the sale of machine guns manufactured after 1986.
Interestingly, according to several sources, approximately 175,000 automatic firearms have been licensed by the ATF and evidence suggests that NONE of these weapons has ever been involved in a violent crime.
RULES
The second place you will find Federal Laws is in the “Rules.”
In addition to chasing “bad guys,” the ATF has “Rulemaking” authority, which is basically synonymous to “law” making authority. To understand how Rules work we first need to discuss how the ATF has the authority to enact the Rules.
ATF agents operate under the US Department of Justice and have some of the broadest law enforcement powers of any federal agency, as they are empowered to enforce any U.S. Statute. However, the ATF spends most of its time enforcing 2nd Amendment laws that were created by the three Acts mentioned above.
To Understand Rulemaking, you also need to know a little about the structure of the US Government and the ATF:
1. Article II of the Constitution gives the Executive Branch of the government (the President) the power to “execute and enforce” federal law.
2. Article II of the Constitution also gives the President the power to delegate the “execution and enforcement” responsibilities of the laws to various departments of the federal government (Including the United States Department of Justice (USDOJ).
3. The USDOJ and its 40 component organizations (including the ATF) are overseen by the Attorney General, which is appointed by the President (requiring Senate Confirmation).
4. The President also nominates someone as the Director of ATF. As with the AG, the appointment as Director of the ATF also requires a Senate Confirmation (you will understand the importance of Senate Confirmation further on in the story)
5. The Director of the ATF appoints a Deputy Director.
6. The Deputy Director hires department heads for their eight departments (called “Offices”).
What is a Rule?
If the ATF determines that the original wording of a law isn’t specific enough to cover a particular situation, they can amend the law by creating a Rule. A Rule is nothing more than a written statement of what the ATF thinks the law means, and how the law should be applied. Fortunately, the ATF has to follow a very specific process in order to create a Rule:
The Rulemaking Process
1. A draft of the proposed Rule gets submitted to the ATF’s Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA).
2. By statute the OIRA must inform the public of the proposed Rule by publishing a “Notice of Proposed Rulemaking” in the Federal Register. Basically, think of the Federal Register as a newspaper and the Notice as a classified ad in the newspaper.
3. A 30-day (minimum) public comment period begins as soon as the Proposed Rule is published. During this 30-day period, the public can comment on the proposed rule.
4. The ATF is then obligated to respond to all comments and, if enough people raised similar concerns, the ATF may amend the Proposed Rule.
5. Once the ATF has a “final” version of the Rule, it is again reviewed by their internal regulatory people (OIRA).
6. The Final Rule is then published in the Federal register
7. Once the Final Rule is published, the Rule is considered “implemented” and it may now be “enforced” by the ATF.
Overturning a Rule
Once a Rule is implemented it is very difficult to change. There are only 3 ways to get rid of a Rule:
1. The Rule may be voided if Congress passes a Resolution of Disapproval. However, the President can decide to veto Congress’ Resolution, which makes it unlikely the Rule will be overruled. Think about it… the ATF personnel were appointed (either directly or indirectly) by the President, so he isn’t likely to overturn the Rule?
2. The Rule may be invalidated by the Supreme Court if they find the Rule is unconstitutional. This does happen occasionally, but the process takes a long time. Therefore, the Rule will be in effect for several years before the Supreme Court gets the opportunity to make a decision.
3. A new President appoints a new Attorney General. The new AG appoints a new Director of ATF. The new Director of the ATF proposes an amendment to the existing Rule.
Rulemaking example:
In the early 1980’s a police officer was shot and killed in the line of duty. Though the officer was wearing a vest, the bullet that killed him completely penetrated his body armor. In response to the shooting, Mario Biaggi (Congressional District Representative from New York), introduced H.R.4 (commonly known as The Law Enforcement Officers Protection Act or LEOPA). One of the results of LEOPA was an amendment to the Gun Control Act, which contains the following definition for armor piercing ammunition.
18 U.S.C. 921(a)(17):
(B) The term “armor piercing ammunition” means:
(i) a projectile or projectile core which may be used in a handgun and which is constructed entirely (excluding the presence of traces of other substances) from one or a combination of tungsten alloys, steel, iron, brass, bronze, beryllium copper or depleted uranium; or
(ii) a full jacketed projectile larger than .22 caliber designed and intended for use in a handgun and whose jacket has a weight of more than 25 percent of the total weight of the projectile.
In addition to defining armor piercing ammunition, the amendment placed statutory restrictions on the manufacture, possession and sales of armor piercing ammunition. However, Congress added a provision to the GCA that gave the Attorney General the authority to exempt certain ammunition “primarily used for sporting purposes.”
So, at this point we know three things:
1. Armor piercing ammo is exclusively defined as handgun ammo (rifle ammo is not included in the ban);
2. Armor piercing handgun ammo is illegal to manufacture, sell, or possess; and
3. The Attorney General can grant exemptions for ammo primarily used for sporting purposes.
In February 2015, the ATF proposed the following Rule:
Armor piercing bullets will be classified as “primarily intended to be used for sporting purposes” if the bullet is loaded into a cartridge for which the only handgun that is readily available in the ordinary channels of commercial trade is a single shot handgun.
Okay… That’s a bunch of legalese, so what does it mean?
The original ban on Armor Piercing Ammunition was limited to handgun ammunition, but the Proposed Rule would broaden the ban to include any bullet capable of being fired from a semi-automatic handgun. Therefore, ammunition in common rifle calibers (such as .223 caliber ammo) would become illegal to manufacture, as a few semi-automatic handguns use that caliber. It does not matter how many handguns are made in that caliber, so long as they are commercially available. Obviously, the result the Proposed Rule would be completely contrary to the intent of the original legislation, as passed by Congress.
During the 30-day open notice period following the Notice of Proposed Rule, more that 80,000 comments we made. Additionally, a letter was written to the ATF by 230 Congressmen that clearly explained and detailed how the ATF was egregiously exceeding the spirit and intent of the legislators. Finally, the ATF wrote a “Special Advisory” letter stating the following:
“Although ATF endeavored to create a proposal that reflected a good faith interpretation of the law and balanced the interests of law enforcement, industry, and sportsmen, the vast majority of the comments received to date are critical of the framework, and include issues that deserve further study. Accordingly, ATF will not at this time seek to issue a final framework.”
10 days later, the Director of the ATF resigned to “pursue opportunities in the private sector.”
Conclusion
Though the ATF decided not to continue their pursuit to ban armor piercing rifle ammunition, they have been successful at implementing hundreds of other nonsensical Rules. As Rules have the same force and effect of law, the ATF wields a tremendous amount of power through Rulemaking. Unfortunately, this power is often abused and our 2nd Amendment rights are further restricted. I don’t know about you, but I elected for my Congressional Representatives to enact the law, not some gun hating pencil pusher that works at the ATF.
Everything you will ever need
The Trust Shop will revise your Gun Trust as many times as you want, without any limits, qualifications, or exceptions. The only reason we call them “Lifetime Revisions” is because “Forever Revisions” sounds a bit creepy. But, in all seriousness, your Gun Trust comes with free revisions, forever! Just read some of the 
Now, instead of trying to decipher the crazy ATF Application directions on your own, Trust Shop customers get to use our ATF Form Generators. The end result is the exact same ATF Application, but the process of creating the Applications is much, much easier and makes so much more sense.
Sadly, we can go on and on with the list of things you get from other Gun Trust providers. But, you can visit their websites and see for yourself. Additional charges are hidden everywhere… Documents are generic… And, Revisions are impossible, inaccurate, or expensive!
The Trust Shop was created in 2008, when a group of gun-loving lawyers decided to figure out a way to get Gun Trusts into the hands of as many people as possible. Each of them already provided Gun Trusts to their clients, but the average cost of a full-service Gun Trust was around $400, and that was just too expensive for most people to afford. So, they decided to figure out a way to make Gun Trusts more economical.
1. Privacy about firearms ownership
2. Privacy about your personal information in general
